The artillery available to support the army fell into a variety
of categories, including guns, howitzers, and mortars. Guns, so-called,
fire projectiles at high velocity over relatively flat trajectories. Howitzers,
in contrast, usually fire larger projectiles at lower velocity and higher
trajectories in order to clear intervening obstacles. Mortars are basically
infantry weapons firing "bombs"

Projectile trajectories of mortar,
gun, and howitzer. |
| |
|
at angles greater than 45 degrees over short distances
and are mainly smooth-bore weapons where guns and howitzers are usually
rifled to impart a spin on projectiles in order to render them more aerodynamic,
thus increasing range and accuracy. Most artillery pieces were mounted on
carriages and towed between firing positions, but self-propelled guns mounted
on tank chassis were also used.
Artillery operated according to two basic methods: direct and indirect fire.
Direct fire was directed over open sights against a target clearly visible
from the gun. This method was most common with tank and anti-tank guns,
where fire had to be aimed to be effective, and could be hazardous as the
gun (and its crew) was itself exposed to enemy fire. Indirect fire called
for a forward observer, in communication with the guns by telephone or radio,
to correct the fall of shot. This method took longer than direct fire to
achieve accuracy but the guns could be better protected from counter-battery
fire. It was used with heavy, medium and field guns.
|
| Suggested Reading: |
Leslie W.C.S. Barnes, Canada's Guns: An Illustrated History of
Artillery (Ottawa: National Museums of Canada, 1979).
Shelford Bidwell and Dominick Graham, Fire-Power: British
Army Weapons and Theories of War 1904-1945 (London: George Allen
& Unwin, 1982).
George G Blackburn, The Guns of Normandy: A Soldier's Eye
View, France 1944 (Toronto: McClelland, 1995).
Ian V. Hogg, British and American Artillery of World War
2 (London: Arms and Armour, 1978). |
|