|
Flight Lieutenant R.M. Aldwinckle and his
crew were joining the escort for convoy
ON-207 when they sighted U-420. The first
attack was marred by depth charges that
did not explode, possibly because of condensation
freezing the hydrostatic fuses. In a second
attack, Aldwinckle released a homing torpedo,
described is his report as a 600 lb depth
charge. U-420 sank after a third attack.
The following excerpts are taken from the
secret Command Provisional U-Boat Assessment
Form.
Aircraft crew:
| No |
Grade |
Nom |
Poste |
| J5766. |
Lt |
R.M. Aldwinckle |
Capitaine |
| J12994. |
Ss Lt |
E.F. Brady |
Copilote |
| J10708 |
Ss Lt |
P.G. Hugues |
Navigateur |
| J36688 |
Ss Lt |
R.W. Beamish |
Mitrailleur |
| R121205 |
Sgt. |
Loader, C.D. |
Radio |
| R122317 |
Sgt. |
Griggs, J.G. |
Tourelle supérieure centre |
| R131352 |
Cpl. |
Jackson, IN |
Tourelle de queue |
Narrative:
While flying at 8000 feet over 6/10 S.C.,
with a base of 2500 feet, to avoid icing
and on a course of 356 deg.T., the Captain
sighted at 1101Z a U-Boat fully surfaced,
60 deg. to port at 20 miles distance. U-Boat’s
course 110 deg.T. at 10 knots. The aircraft
manoeuvred so as to keep the sun behind
it and dived on the U-Boat, taking advantage
of cloud cover. The submarine appeared to
sight the aircraft at approximately five
miles distance and then trimmed to hull
down position. The attack was carried out
from three o’clock at 1105 GMT in
position 5049N – 4101W. Six 250 lb
DC’s [depth charges] set for 25 feet
and spaced at 60 feet for 215 mph. were
dropped from 75 feet at an I.A.S. [indicated
air speed] of 220 mph. aimed to straddle
the C/T [conning tower]. The tail gunner
states that he saw at least three DC’s
enter the water at three o’clock,
of which one was seen to explode forty yards
short of C/T. At least two splashes of entry
were seen between the explosion and the
U-Boat. One of the splashes was close to
the hull. None were seen on the port side
of U-Boat. Two or more men were seen on
the C/T and guns were seen to swing towards
A/C [aircraft] as it went in for the attack,
but no fire came from the U-Boat during
run-in. The aircraft did not fire during
approach to attack because the upper turret
was fogged from icing (picked up in cloud)
which obscured the gunner’s vision.
The rear gunner fired a short burst as the
aircraft crossed the U-Boat. The aircraft
then made a sharp turn to port and climbed
to 1000 feet. Aircraft “A”/10BR
was not fitted with a nose gun.
The U-Boat began to fire flak, putting
up a heavy curtain of fire with at times
as many as fifty bursts in the air at one
time. The aircraft returned fire intermittently
for one hour and nine minutes, approximately
at 1211/Z the U-Boat was observed to start
crash dive and aircraft turned in for attack.
At 1212/Z the U-Boat submerged at 1_ miles
from aircraft and the aircraft began attack
with the 600 lb DC. On the first run over
the target, the conditions of height and
speed made it impractical to execute an
attack. On the second run, the 600 lb DC
was dropped under very good conditions of
height and airspeed, namely height 250-300
feet. and I.A.S. of 158 mpg. It was released
two mins. after U-Boat submerged, The aircraft
was heading directly into wind and was in
level flight. The path of the 600 DC in
the air was not noted, nor was the point
of entry observed, however, the navigator
states that the unit was aimed to strike
150-200 yard ahead of the C/T swirl which
was still visible. The approach was made
from eight o’clock to the U-Boat’s
track which was estimated at 205 deg.T.
The sea was rough and there was no evidence
as to the functioning of the unit nor were
there any signs of damage to the U-Boat.
The aircraft turned to port in order to
observe the result of the attack.
Approximately four minutes after the 600
lb DC was dropped, a periscope was definitely
identified by three members of the crew.
It was on a course of 100 deg.T. The aircraft
made its approach from two o’clock
to the periscope’s track and dropped
two 250 lb DC’s at 1218/Z from 50
feet. The I.A.S. was 100 mpg. The point
of entry of the DC’s with relation
to the periscope was not observed but photographic
evidence indicates that No. 2 DC fell directly
over periscope track and slightly to the
rear of periscope itself. Both DC’s
were seen to explode with a third explosion
or black eruption observed slightly of the
rear of the mid-point between the DC plumes.
The tail-gunner states that this third explosion
shot up like an oil gusher as under great
pressure and rose to a height of fifty to
sixty feet. It rose like a water spout.
These explosions took place four minutes
after 600 lb DC was dropped. This description
is borne out by photographic evidence. The
Captain states that on circling the spot,
the waster was stained black with a reddish
tinge and this was distinct from DC scum,
over an area approximately one and one half
times that DC residue.
Following the attack, a two hour smoke
float was dropped. The aircraft remained
in the vicinity for one half hour and then
S/C for the C/V [convoy]. Enroute to the
C/V it altered course to investigate smoke
seen on the horizon, and discovered a smoke
float and three naval vessels in the vicinity,
thirty miles at 310 deg.T from C/V ON-207.
Information concerning attack passed to
vessels by V/S [visual signal]. The aircraft
then proceeded to C/V and also passed the
information to it using R/T [radio transmitter]
on instruction from S.O. [Signals Officer]
Patrol carried as ordered by S.O. At 1548/Z
the navigator sighted a suspicious object
in position 5051N – 4056W which proved
to be a fully surface U-Boat on Co.140 deg.T/8
knots. Engaged U-Boat with M/G fire at about
one mile distance. The U-Boat set course
for C/V at 1616/Z This information was passed
to S.O. while aircraft was enroute to C/V.
It is worthy of note that in both instances
of U-Boat sightings, the A.S.G. failed to
give any indication of the U-Boat’s
presence, despite the fact that the set
was serviceable and functioning properly
on both occasions.
Remarks on U-Boat Tactics
At 1105/Z the U-Boat employed the following
tactics viz: turned in tight circles so
as to keep the stern – heavily armed
– directed towards the aircraft. The
A/A fire was from rear bandstand. AT 1548/Z,
in contrast to the above, the U-Boat adopted
entirely different tactics viz: pivoting
practically within its own length, thereby
keeping the aircraft on the U-Boat’s
beam and presenting heavy fire from guns
mounted on bandstands fore and aft on C/T.
The crew consider that the U-Boat’s
fire came from two quadruple mounts located,
one forward and the other aft of C/T. There
were no deck guns. This second U-Boat was
bluish white in color while the first was
covered with rust.
|