| Lieutenant-General E.L.M. Burns | |||||
|
Eedson Louis Millard (Tommy) Burns, born in Westmount, Quebec, on June 17th, 1897; died in Manotick, Ontario, on September 13th, 1985. Canadian Army officer and diplomat.
At the beginning of WWI, 17-year old Tommy Burns entered the Royal Military
College in Kingston, Ontario. He stayed only a short while, long enough
to be awarded a Special War Certificate; in June 1915, as soon as he was
18, he enlisted with the Royal Canadian Engineers and was sent to England
the following year as a signaller. He was on the front in August 1916.
During the following years, Burns, twice wounded, was awarded the Military
Cross for laying and repairing communication wires while under enemy fire.
When the war ended, he was a staff captain with the 12th Infantry Brigade. Burns pursued his military career with the Engineers Corps of the Permanent
Force. He rose in the hierarchy, being promoted from a captain to a major
in 1927, to a lieutenant colonel in 1939 (he received a lieutenant colonel's
brevet in 1935). He attended the School of Military Engineering in Chatham,
England, in 1920-1921, the British Army Staff College in Quetta, India,
in 1928-1929 and the Imperial Defence College from 1939 to the declaration
of the state of war. In the pre-war era, Burns wrote many articles for the Canadian Defence
Quarterly or, under the pen name of Arlington B. Conway, for the American
Mercury. He dealt with topics such the training of troops, mobility,
the need for a fast motor vehicle to replace cavalry, the impossibility
of destroying large cities through air bombings only, the organization
of infantry and armoured divisions. When the war broke out in September
1939, Burns was viewed by his superiors as a brilliant officer, cut out
for a promotion to a high-ranking command post. During the war's early months, Tommy Burns served as General Staff Officer
at the Canadian Military Headquarters overseas. He was promoted to colonel
in May 1940 and called back to Ottawa as Assistant Deputy Chief of the
General Staff. He was back in England in May 1941 as Brigadier General
Staff of I Canadian Corps, a position he was to occupy only for a few
months. Between August 1941 and February 1942, Burns served with the Canadian
Armoured Corps as Officer Administering. He was then entrusted with commanding
the 4th Canadian Armoured Division, the creation of which had partly been
his work. On May 1st, 1943, Burns was promoted to Major-General and put
in charge of the 2nd Canadian Infantry Division. A few months later, on
January 30th, 1944, he was commanding officer of the 5th Canadian Armoured
Division. At that time, the 5th Division had been involved in the Italy campaign
for some ten weeks: it was Burns' first experience as a commander in a
combat situation, a positive one indeed as he was appointed commander
of I Canadian Corps as early as March 20th, 1944. Burns successfully led
the charge that broke through the German lines in the Liri Valley in May
1944, despite severe losses. A few months later, in September 1944, I
Canadian Corps pierced the Gothic Line in Rimini, opening up the plains
of northern Italy to the Allies. In spite of these successes, Burns was
criticized for his lack of flexibility and leadership. On November 5th,
1944, he lost the command of I Canadian Corps and was transferred behind
the lines as General Officer Commanding, Canadian Section, General Headquarters,
2nd Echelon, 21 Army Group. After WWII, Burns was posted to the Department of Veteran Affairs, where
he served as Deputy Minister between 1950 and 1954. That year, he was
put in charge of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO),
a peacekeeping unit at the Israeli-Arab border. When the 1956 war broke
out in the Middle East, Burns took command of the United Nations Emergency
Force (UNEF), remaining in charge until 1959. The following year, he was
appointed counsellor for disarmament issues in the Canadian government,
with the rank of ambassador. Tommy Burns was brilliant man, one of the brightest Canadian officers of his generation, and one of the few who gave serious thought to the nature of the military profession and who published extensively on strategic and tactical issues. However, his introvert, unsmiling and austere nature hardly made him an inspiring leader for fighting men.
|
|||||
| Next: General
H.D.G. Crerar |